🌗 Note 10 Plus Vs Iphone 11 Pro

และในวันนี้ทางทีมงาน Thaimobilecenter ก็ได้นำ iPhone 11 Pro Max ไปถ่ายภาพแนว Portrait เปรียบเทียบกับคู่แข่งคนสำคัญอย่าง Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ ที่สามารถทำคะแนน DxOMark ได้เท่ากันกับ iPhone 11 The Apple iPhone 11 Pro screen has a 5.8 -inch size with resolution 2436 × 1125 px. The Aspect ratio of a screen is 19.5:9. The pixel density is equal to 458 pixels per inch (PPI). Apple iPhone 11 Pro screen based on OLED technology and able to reproduce 16,777,216 colors with contrast ratio 2000000:1 and color of depth – 24 bits. Anentirely Black OLED Screen uses 0 watts of Display Power. For Maximum Brightness and Display Power the iPhone 11 Pro Max has up to 8% higher Relative Display Power Efficiency. compared to the iPhone XS Max. But for lower Brightness settings of 150 to 300 nits, the Display Power Efficiency improvements. SmartphoneXIAOMI Redmi Note 10 Pro Gris 6-128Go. (149) Ecran : large 6,6" soit 16,8 cm. Mémoire interne : 128 Go. Capteurs photos : 4 (108 MP en capteur principal) Mémoire RAM : 6 Go - Processeur : 8 coeurs jusqu'à 2,3 GHz. Le + : Ecran 120Hz Hi-Res, quadruple caméra de 108MP. GalaxyNote 10 Plus Galaxy Note 10 Galaxy S9/S8 Galaxy S9 Plus Galaxy S9 Galaxy S8 Plus iPhone 11 Pro iPhone 11 iPhone SE; iPhone SE (3rd Gen) GalaxyNote 20 Series; Galaxy Note 10 Series; APPLE. APPLE Menu iPhone 11 Pro; iPhone 11 / XR ; OTHER. Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus Tempered Glass Screen Protector 7 has a BSI sensor. Apple iPhone 11. Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus. A BSI (backside The iPhone 11 Pro Max slots in the space between the Note 10 and Note 10+, at 6.5 inches to the Samsung 6.3 inches and 6.8 inches. The resolution is also roughly in the middle of the two Samsung MediaTekHelio G96 Ultra Gaming Processor Ultimate Performance for An Incredible Experience. Packing more speed and more power, the all-new Helio G96 incorporates two A76 and six A55 processors, which work in tandem to harness next-level intelligence for groundbreaking performance. Tổnghợp các phiên bản iPhone 11 Pro: iPhone 11 Pro 64GB và 11 Pro 64GB 2 sim. iPhone 11 Pro 256GB và 11 Pro 256GB 2 sim. iPhone 11 Pro 512GB và 11 Pro 512GB 2 sim. Camera iPhone 11 Pro được nâng cấp cả số lượng lẫn chất lượng. Ở mặt sau, số lượng ống kính tăng lên thành 3 và hỗ trợ thêm Confrontocompleto Apple iPhone 13 vs Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone Xs Max. Confronto completo Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Xiaomi Redmi 9A. Samsung, OnePlus, Huawei — выбираем флагман взамен iPhone 11. В МАГАЗИН 11.07.2022 в 09:36. Добрый день, yFci. Apple’s new iPhone 11 lineup the company unveiled in September came with a few surprises for once, with some early renders and physical designs that leaked out shown to be a bit off and allowing Apple to actually give fans a few things they weren’t expecting. But it wasn’t just the designs that surprised. The next-generation A13 Bionic processor in the phones also, according to Apple, packs 20% more power than its predecessor, allowing for big performance improvements yet again in this newest iPhone series. Specifically, though, what does that improvement mean in terms of battery life? To answer that question, the Phonebuff YouTube channel has just posted the results of its latest battery test head-to-head, and the winner is clear. As a reminder about the Phonebuff tests, a robotic arm, automated chatbot, and custom scripts are used to try and keep things fair as well as simulating real-world smartphone usage as much as possible. Speaking of the test, it’s comprised of a variety of 1-hour sessions in which the phones are studied as to how well they handle browser usage, phone calls, emails, and the like. And to get a comprehensive look at battery life, the phones are put through a 16-hour standby test. The test kicks off with a phone call test, with both devices put through the paces of dealing with a 1-hour phone call. At that point, the iPhone battery has only dropped by 1%, compared to a 5% drop for the Note 10+. For the next several rounds of testing, the story is similar. Messaging, emails, browser comparisons, scrolling through Instagram on both devices — the iPhone 11 Pro Max battery stays ahead of the Note 10+ and barely slips at all, with the former’s 4000 mAh battery more than holding its own against the Note 10+’s bigger 4300 mAh version. As the testing finishes up with comparing both phones’ browser usage and how much Instagram usage drains the battery, at this point, it seems the iPhone is still some 8 percentage points ahead. The rest of the testing pretty much follows this same trajectory. After the full 16-hour standby test, for example, the iPhone battery has only shaved off another 6%, compared to a 10% drop for the note — putting the iPhone a full 12 percentage points ahead of the Note at this point in the matchup. Image source Phonebuff Gaming, interestingly, doesn’t seem to shave too much off either phone’s battery. After one hour of playing Alto’s Adventure, the difference between the two phones isn’t that big, though the iPhone is still 1 percentage point ahead. Pressing on towards the end, the 11 Pro Max still manages to have a little juice left after the Note 10+ finally dies, which means The iPhone 11 Pro Max, as you can watch in the video, is officially the first phone ever tested as part of the Phonebuff battery comparison to make it to the app cycle test. That’s when apps are constantly opened, loaded, closed, and then that process is repeated until the phone dies. Finally, finally, after 1 hour and 5 minutes of that testing, the iPhone finally dies, which brings us to the final tally for each device. Per Phonebuff, the iPhone 11 Pro Max battery lasted for 27 hours and five minutes, while the Note 10+ hung on for 25 hours and 3 minutes, allowing the iPhone 11 Pro Max to now sit at the very top of the complete battery test rankings, which you can check out here. Meanwhile, the full battery test video from PhoneBuff is embedded at the top of this post. When we talk about a flagship gadget, each of the device's parameters have to be top-notch. Manufacturers strive to ensure this, but as the industry matures, the lines that differentiate the peak performance difference between such parameters get blurred. Therefore, to ascertain which gadget is superior in one area display, camera performance, etc in-depth analyses are necessary. Apple's iPhone 11 lineup became official earlier this month, and as the first devices start to enter the market, we can gauge just how different the device is from its biggest competitor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus. To that end, we've already compared the gadgets' specifications in-depth and taken a look at their benchmarks. Now, as the good folks over at DisplayMate are out with a display analysis of the iPhone 11 Pro Max, we can compare the two OLED panels present on the Note 10 and the iPhone. This comparison is justified as both gadgets support HDR10+ and are capable of support modern video playback standards. Take a look below for more details. iPhone 11 Pro Max Vs Galaxy Note 10 Plus Display Reflectance, Brightness, Color Accuracy, Power Consumption Compared When analyzing a display, it isn't all about resolution. While a lot of displays integrate pixels sufficient to earn them a 4K qualification, how these pixels reproduce content and other parameters set apart the winners from the losers. Naturally, these parameters require investments, and it's no surprise that high-end gadgets incorporating some of the best display panels in the world have equally high prices. Therefore, we've segregated this comparison into three segments. The first deals with color accuracy, intensity and shift. The second compares brightness and accuracy, while the third segment sees how the iPhone and Note hold up when their viewing angles and power consumption are tested. Before we start, here's a brief overlay on the display specifications of the Galaxy Note 10 Plus and iPhone 11 Pro Max. The Note 10 has the larger display, and therefore it's got more pixels vs the iPhone's Samsung's phablet has million blue and red subpixels each, and million green subpixels, while Apple's iPhone has million blue and red subpixels each, and million green subpixels. Both support DCI-P3 and sRGB color gamuts with automatic switching, but the Note 10 Plus also features a vivid mode with the native wide color gamut of an OLED display. 2 of 9 iPhone 11 Pro Max Vs Galaxy Note 10 Plus Absolute & White Color Accuracy Goes To Note 10, Color Accuracy With APL Goes To iPhone When we talk about color accuracy, the iPhone 11 Pro Max's White color temperature is almost perfectly alligned with the D65 Standard 6500K. Samsung's Note 10 Plus, on the other hand, has slightly warmer whites. Samsung's phablet does have more white color accuracy JNCD = Just Noticeable Color Difference of less than the iPhone 11 Pro Max's Samsung's phablet also has more accurate color reproduction on average, with the iPhone's error double at JNCD for the DCI-P3 color gamut. The largest color error for Cyan-Blue is in DCI-P3 and in sRGB for the iPhone 11 Pro Max. This is significantly higher than the Note 10 Plus' readings, especially for sRGB where the difference is more than 3x. However, the tables turn when we analyze the two devices with the Average Picture Level APL. For OLED displays, APL is defined as the number of red/green/blue pixels on a display fired up divided by all three fired up to produce white. So a 50% average pixel level means that either one pixel set is fully firing up and another is partially firing up, or all three are partially firing up or one is fully firing and two are partially firing. Based on APL, which reflects real-life usage, the iPhone 11 Pro Max is superior. Its whites are slightly more accurate than the Note 10's for DCI-P3 and sRGB, and its average color error is almost a quarter of the Note. This difference is also visible in the devices' largest color error. Finally, talking about intensity a display's ability to mix primary colors and contrast, the Note 10 Plus is the winner with a Gamma rating closest to the standard. The Galaxy S10 has a gamma rating. iPhone 11 Pro Max Vs Galaxy Note 10 Plus iPhone's Got A Brighter Display But Note Wins Out In Reflectance Moving towards brightness and reflectance, we see mixed results. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a brighter display when averaged out and with 1%, 50% and 100% APL in average ambient light. However, the iPhone's brightness shifts more when APL is decreased 15% vs the Note 10's 6%. In high ambient light, the Galaxy Note 10 Plus is the clear winner. Samsung's phablet has an amazing 1257 cd/m² brightness in high ambient light with 1% APL. Its 778 cd/m² for 100% APL and 929 cd/m² for 50% APL are also above the iPhones' results. These results aren't shown in the table above, as DisplayMate only provides a range for the iPhone 11 Pro Max's light output in high ambient light, with the range being between 769 - 904 cd/m². Looking at the contrast rating which combines peak brightness and reflectance to determine readability in high ambient light. According to the figures, the Galaxy Note 10 Plus is better for reading when present in a light-heavy surrounding. The phablet's contrast rating ranges between 181-292, higher when compared to the iPhone's 171-20, and since CR is defined as peak brightness/average reflectance, the higher value is better. Speaking of which, the Galaxy Note 10 Plus continues to hold DisplayMate's record of lowest mirror reflection on a smartphone. The device reflects only of light when viewed directly, which is lesser than the iPhone's Additionally, the Note also reflects less light from all directions as indicated by its Average Screen Reflection percentage. iPhone 11 Pro Max Vs Galaxy Note 10 Plus Viewing Angles Favor Note 10 Plus & So Does Power Efficiency Due to emitting more light, the iPhone 11 Pro Max's display also consumes more power. This is despite the fact that the Note 10 Plus has a larger display surface area inch² vs the iPhone's inch². The iPhone 11 Pro Max consumes Watts on average while emitting 821 cd/m² light, and Watts when emitting 769 cd/m² light. In comparison, the Note 10 Plus consumes Watt on average with a 465 cd/m² output, and Watt maximum with a 414 cd/m² output. While the iPhone is more power hungry and emits more light, the Note 10 Plus shows better performance at 30° viewing angles. While the two devices have a near similar White error, the iPhone 11 Pro Max distorts red, blue and green significantly at 30°. Additionally, Apple's gadget isn't too good at maintaining color accuracy at a mixture of 255 Red, 128 Green and 0 Blue. Over here, the smartphone shows a JNCD error, nearly three times the Note 10 Plus' JNCD. To conclude, the iPhone 11 Pro Max is the better device when we talk about color accuracy for daily usage. It's also the better choice for viewing content in high ambient light. However, the Note 10 Plus wins out in reading when present in high ambient light, for overall color accuracy, color error due to viewing angles, reflectance and power efficiency. Thoughts? Let us know what you think in the comments section below and stay tuned. We'll keep you updated on the latest. Depends on how deep you are in each use the 11max for simple things, ecosystem is for the beast it is for everything enjoy typing on the 11max because it had a rounder edge. Note is a little sharper, pointy corners. Media is awesome though, expandable memory is great! S-pen for line, if you cant have both, stick to what you have now, you’re not missing wait for what the pixel will offer. It should be coming out soon. It'll be a week soon since Apple updated the iPhones featuring a new chip that builds on last year's A12. Apple's built a strong foundation with its mobile SoCs and larger variants of the iPhones' processors also end up on the iPad due to this base. Naturally, this also allows the silicon to compete on its own with Samsung's Exynos and Qualcomm's Snapdragon processors. Within a couple of days following the iPhone 11 lineup's launch, we witnessed a flurry of benchmarks surface on GeekBench and Antutu. These were accompanied by worrying concerns that the devices are limited to 4GB RAM. Now, in order to make early estimates of how the iPhone 11, iPhone 11 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro Max stack up against current Android flagships, we've decided to compare the iOS devices' benchmarks to their Android counterparts. Take a look below for more details. iPhone 11 Pro Max Vs Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus - Antutu & GeekBench Comparison Samsung, just like Apple, has a lot of resources to invest in smartphone development. This has led to the company catching up to and surpassing the Cupertino tech giant when it comes to aesthetics. Apple's iPhones 11 follow the design form debuted by the company on the iPhone X - two years back, while Samsung has introduced a new design language with the Galaxies Note 10. Now, with the new iPhones out, we've got GeekBench and Antutu scores to compare them with the Notes, and we'll start by pitting the iPhone 11 Pro Max against the Galaxy Note 10 Plus. Fresh after an iPhone launch, GeekBench sees a handful of scores surface that aren't referenced by the smartphones' marketing name. To lookup the iPhone 11 Pro Max on GeekBench, you'd have to search using iPhone 12,5 or D431AP, with the latter referring to the smartphone's motherboard. The scores for both GeekBench and Antutu show a lead for the new iPhone. However, we're still waiting for detailed Antutu scores for the smartphone which segregate performance according to GPU, Memory, UI and other parameters. In GeekBench the A13 powering 2019's iPhones widens the lead over the Snapdragon 855 evenly in single and multi-core tests. Scores of the iPhone XS Max powered by the A12 aggregate to 4813 in single and 11381 in multi-core testing. Now, the iPhone 11 Pro manages to gain 2054 points over the Note 10 Plus in single-core performance. In multi-core, the smartphone has a 2297 point lead over its predecessor. This is a good gain, but since the A13's true competitor will be Qualcomm's next Snapdragon chipset, this comparison isn't really oranges to oranges. In addition to GeekBench, Antutu's Weibo account also shared benchmarks for the three iPhones a week back. Going by a single score for the iPhone 11 Pro Max, it appears that the true performance gains made by the A13 are in areas other than the CPU. While the iPhone XS Max loses out to the Note 10 Plus in Antutu aggregates, the iPhone 11 Pro Max has a 103,633 point lead. Apple's GPU present on the A12 loses to the Snapdragon 855's Adreno 640 GPU, and we're interested to see if the A13 gains over the 855 in CPU or in the GPU. Inferring this from the gains made in GeekBench, the A13's gains can go either way. More on this below. iPhone 11 Pro Vs Galaxy Note 10 Benchmark Comparison Shows Lead For Apple's 2019 Lineup Moving towards the iPhone 11 Pro, the three scores that we've managed to gather paint a picture similar to the iPhone 11 Pro Max. While GeekBench has been generous in providing scores for the larger iPhone Pro, only two scores for the smallest gadget in Apple's 2019 iPhone lineup are available as of now. These show a lead over the Galaxy Note 10 just like the iPhone 11 Pro Max led over the Note 10 Plus. In Antutu, the iPhone once again leads by approximately 100,000 points, and according to the note shared on Antutu's Weibo account, GPU performance witnesses the strongest gain this year. If this is true, then Apple will have matched the Adreno 640 with the A13's GPU, and whether the San Diego chip giant Qualcomm will catch up with the next Snapdragon is unknown. However, given Qualcomm's strong GPU designs, it's naive to count the company out of the picture. Based on a hunch, it is possible that the 2019 Snapdragon maintains the lineup's graphics performance over Apple's An chips. We'll also be in a better position to compare the Snapdragon 855 and A13's GPU performance after graphics-only tests of the iPhones 11 lineup are avalaible. Concluding by taking a look at how the iPhone 11 takes on GeekBench and Antutu, it's clear that Apple has ensured that the three 2019 iPhones perform similarly. The iPhone 11 gains 1GB RAM over its predecessor, and despite the two OLED iPhones having the 'Pro' moniker, they've got 4GB RAM each, suggest both GeekBench and Antutu. Judging by this, Apple believes that camera sensors and display materials are sufficient to ensure that a gadget tailors to professionals. We'd disagree with the company, but at this point, ensuring that an LCD iPhone falls into the same category as OLED ones is more important to Apple than ensuring its devices are equipped with what they market. Finally, while these are only initial performance comparisons of Apple's 2019 iPhones with the Galaxies Note 10, we've also compared the Galaxy Note 10 Plus to the iPhone 11 Pro Max here. So take a look if you're interested and let us know what you think in the comments section below. VS Here we compared two flagship smartphones the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus with Exynos 9 Octa 9825 that was released on August 7, 2019, against the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, which is powered by Apple A15 Bionic and came out 26 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets. DifferencesReviewSpecsBenchmarksBattery lifeCameraComments Key differences An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus Has 2x more RAM 12GB versus 6GBExpandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1000GBFingerprint scannerSlow-motion recording at 960FPSHas 2 SIM card slotsFaster storage type - UFS versus NVMeReverse charging featureCPU with a higher amount of cores +2Weighs 44 grams less Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Higher display refresh rate – 120 HzShows 59% longer battery life 4344 vs 2735 hoursBetter camera quality According to DxOMark rating45% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark 799K versus 552KDelivers 33% higher peek brightness 1060 against 796 nitsThe rear camera has a 3x optical zoomApple releases software updates and supports their phones a few years longer than SamsungThe phone is 2-years and 2-months newerReady for eSIM technology Review Display Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Battery Battery life, charging type and speed Camera Photo and video recording quality Connectivity Networks, ports, data transmission NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Value for money You can enter your local price of these phones in USD or any other currency and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Tests and specifications Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Display Type Super AMOLED OLED Size inches inches Resolution 1440 x 3040 pixels 1284 x 2778 pixels Aspect ratio 199 PPI 495 ppi 458 ppi Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz Max rated brightness 700 nits 1000 nits Max rated brightness in HDR - 1200 nits HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 6 Ceramic Shield Screen-to-body ratio Display features - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DCI-P3 Display tests RGB color space PWM 250 Hz 238 Hz Response time ms ms Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity Peak brightness test auto Sources NotebookCheck [3], [4] Design and build Height mm inches mm inches Width mm inches mm inches Thickness mm inches mm inches Weight 196 gramm oz 240 gramm oz Waterproof IP68 IP68 Rear material Glass Glass Frame material Metal Metal Colors White, Black, Red Black, Silver, Gold, Blue, Green Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display No Performance Tests of Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus and Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max in the benchmarks SoC Chipset Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825 Apple A15 Bionic Max. clock 2730 MHz 3200 MHz CPU cores 8 2 + 2 + 4 6 2 + 4 Architecture - 4 cores at GHz Cortex-A55- 2 cores at GHz Cortex-A75- 2 cores at GHz M4 - 4 cores at GHz Blizzard- 2 cores at GHz Avalanche L3 cache 2 MB - Lithography process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers Graphics Mali G76 MP12 Apple GPU GPU clock 770 MHz 1200 MHz FLOPS ~652 GFLOPS - Memory RAM size 12 GB 6 GB Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz Channels 2 2 Storage Storage size 256 GB 128, 256, 512, 1024 GB Storage type UFS NVMe Memory card MicroSD No Memory card max. size Up to 1000 GB - Benchmarks Geekbench 5 Single-Core CPU 139273 213823 GPU 177762 317561 Memory 118225 126792 UX 114971 136444 Total score 552262 799446 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 98% 82% Graphics test 20 FPS 57 FPS Graphics score 3345 9524 PCMark score 9270 - Software Operating system Android Can be upgraded to Android 11 iOS 15 Can be upgraded to iOS ROM One UI - OS size GB 13 GB Battery Specifications Capacity 4300 mAh 4352 mAh Charge power 45 W 27 W Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion Replaceable No No Wireless charging Yes, Qi/PMA 15 W Yes W Reverse charging Yes, wireless No Fast charging Yes, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge 65% in 30 min Yes 42% in 30 min Full charging time 105 hr 146 hr Battery life tests Web browsing 0737 hr 1455 hr Watching video 1419 hr 2014 hr Gaming 0443 hr 0742 hr Standby 97 hr 140 hr Camera Specs and camera test of smartphones Main camera Matrix 12 megapixels 12 megapixels Image resolution 4000 x 3000 4032 x 3024 Zoom Optical, 2x Optical, 3x Flash LED Dual LED Stabilization Optical Optical 8K video recording No No 4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS 1080p video recording Up to 240FPS Up to 60FPS Slow motion 960 FPS 720p 240 FPS 1080p Angle of widest lens 123° 120° Lenses 4 12 MP + 12 MP + 16 MP + 0 MP 4 12 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP + 0 MP Wide main lens - 12 MP - Aperture f/ - - Focal length 27 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Samsung SAK2L4 ISOCELL CMOS - Phase autofocus Dual Pixel - Optical stabilization - 12 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 26 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Sony IMX703 Exmor-RS CMOS - Phase autofocus Dual Pixel - Optical stabilization Telephoto lens - 12 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 52 mm - Pixel size 1 micron - Sensor 1/ Samsung S5K3M3 ISOCELL CMOS - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization - 12 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 77 mm - Pixel size 1 micron - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization Ultra-wide lens - 16 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 12 mm - Pixel size 1 micron - Sensor 1/ Samsung S5K3P9 ISOCELL CMOS - 12 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 13 mm - Pixel size 1 micron - Phase autofocus Depth lens Yes - Pixel size 1 micron Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus from DxOMark Photo samples of Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max from DxOMark Selfie camera Megapixels 10 megapixels 12 megapixels Image resolution 3648 x 2736 4032 x 3024 Aperture f/ f/ Focal length 26 mm 23 mm Pixel size microns 1 microns Sensor type CMOS Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor size 1/ 1/ Video resolution 2160p 4K at 30 FPS 2160p 4K at 60 FPS DxOMark camera tests Connectivity Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi 6 a/b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display Bluetooth version 5 5 Bluetooth features PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP LE, A2DP USB type USB Type-C - USB version 2 USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS NFC* Yes Yes Infrared port No No Network Number of SIM* 2 1 Type of SIM card Nano Nano Multi SIM mode Standby - eSIM support* No Yes Hybrid slot No No LTE Cat* 20 18 5G support Yes Yes Sound Speakers Stereo Stereo Headphone audio jack No No FM radio No No Dolby Atmos Yes Yes Other Category Flagship Flagship Announced August 2019 September 2021 Release date August 2019 September 2021 SAR head W/kg W/kg SAR body W/kg W/kg Sensors - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Face recognition sensor *Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country. Cast your vote So, which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus 160 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 81 Total votes 241 Related comparisons You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below

note 10 plus vs iphone 11 pro